Blog

Pete continues his series of posts trying to tell the numbskulls of the ragged right how to smarten up and get on parade with a chance of marching in step.&nbsp; He observes many aspects of the modern political battlefield and draws conclusions that ought to have been self-evident ...but evidently are not...All human organisations essentially work the same way. <h3>An effective organisation is one where the people of the front lines know what they are doing and why - are properly equipped&nbsp; - and are respected by their leaders.</h3>Take the US Army, for instance. During WW2, they knew what they were doing and why they were fighting. Fast-forward to Vietnam, where there was no clear basis for the war, no coherence to operations, no discernible plan, and their lives were being wasted. Moreover, they didn't have the backing of the American people.Consequently, discipline collapsed, drug taking was rife, soldiers wouldn't take any risks, and saw their main mission just to stay alive long enough to get home. When there was so little hope of achieving anything, it was not unknown for soldiers to murder their officers.&nbsp;There are parallels with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nobody could say what victory looked like, and the people doing the fighting could scarcely see the point. This is the difference between winning and losing.<figure id="figure-st2vcee4y9m70s27pw"><img id="st2vcee4y9m70s27pw" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/1dE7LdWvERLturmBLJXySYFGcNtYwnuIIUchDHUznHqxCy1tdZXdY7m6CzQTDjNa.jpg" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 50% 30%;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="50%" data-positiony="30%" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/1dE7LdWvERLturmBLJXySYFGcNtYwnuIIUchDHUznHqxCy1tdZXdY7m6CzQTDjNa.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 50% 30%;"></figure>Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery always understood this dynamic. He understood that times had changed, and you couldn't treat fighting men as cannon fodder. They were increasingly educated men who would not fight without a reason. You could no longer take their loyalty for granted, nor could loyalty be achieved with hard discipline. Moreover, men won't fight unless there's hope they can win. This is why leadership is so important. Generals have to lead from the front. Good commanders are always visible.&nbsp;The same is true of political parties.<h3>You cannot expect activists to go out into the street to a sell a party that doesn't have a coherent purpose or policies to speak of. </h3>You can't motivate or inspire people without a vision of what victory looks like. Where you get total collapse is when the leadership takes loyalty for granted, treats the foot soldiers with contempt, insults their intelligence, and isn't committed to the fight. Pretty soon, you have a mutiny. Neither activists nor voters will go out of their way for you.&nbsp;This, ultimately, is why the Tories and Reform are defunct parties. Nobody is able to say what the Tory party is for, nobody understands it, and nobody wants to fight for it. Its leader doesn't even realise there's a war on. Meanwhile, Reform, a new army, has a command structure, plenty of generals but no definition that gives it purpose. It's attracting disillusioned foot soldiers who are desperate for any leadership, but veterans are now starting to see the same patterns emerging. They have plenty of generals but none who actually want to go to war. In place of policies, they have slogans, which is akin with sending troops into battle without rifles. <h3>As such, neither party is capable of taking on the fight and winning.</h3>Here's an <a data-mce-href="https://veo.uk/Picking%20Battles%20Wisely_%20Political%20Strategy%20and%20Leadership.mp3" href="https://veo.uk/Picking%20Battles%20Wisely_%20Political%20Strategy%20and%20Leadership.mp3" target="_blank" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">another&nbsp; AI Audio debate</a> based on this page . <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1889354336259473526" href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1889354336259473526" target="_blank" rel="noopener">From Twitter - go here to comment</a> 11FEB26 0V2 And here's an interesting AI analysis for further study...Here's a briefing document analysing the provided excerpt from "Picking battles wisely" from the WOTE.uk federation blog.Briefing Document: Analysis of "Picking battles wisely" (WOTE.uk)Source: Excerpt from "Picking battles wisely," WOTE.uk Blog, dated February 11, 2025. Authors: PN &amp; WP (Pete &amp; WP assumed) Subject: Analysis of political organisation effectiveness through a military analogy, with specific critique of the Conservative and Reform parties.Executive Summary:The blog post "Picking battles wisely" argues that successful organisations, whether military or political, require a clear purpose, effective leadership that respects and understands its "frontline" members (activists/soldiers), and a demonstrable path to victory. The authors use the analogy of the US Army's contrasting experiences in WWII and Vietnam, highlighting the detrimental effects of a lack of clear objectives and leadership disconnect. The piece then applies this framework to critique the current state of the Conservative ("Tory") and Reform parties in the UK, suggesting they are failing due to a lack of coherent purpose, ineffective leadership, and an inability to inspire or motivate their supporters. WOTE.uk positions itself as a necessary alternative that can provide efficient, common sense government, without the disadvantages of dogma.Key Themes and Ideas:The Importance of Clear Purpose and Objectives: The central argument revolves around the necessity of a well-defined purpose for any organisation to succeed. The authors illustrate this with the military example: "During WW2, they knew what they were doing and why they were fighting. Fast-forward to Vietnam, where there was no clear basis for the war, no coherence to operations, no discernible plan, and their lives were being wasted." The lack of clarity led to a breakdown in morale and effectiveness. Effective Leadership and Respect for "Frontline" Members: The piece emphasises that effective leadership requires respect for and understanding of the people on the "front lines." "An effective organisation is one where the people of the front lines know what they are doing and why - are properly equipped - and are respected by their leaders." The analogy uses Field Marshall Montgomery as an example of a leader who understood the need to motivate and respect his troops, as opposed to treating them as "cannon fodder". The Peril of Disconnect and Contempt: The blog argues that when leadership takes loyalty for granted, treats its members with contempt, and fails to commit to the fight, the organisation will inevitably collapse. "Where you get total collapse is when the leadership takes loyalty for granted, treats the foot soldiers with contempt, insults their intelligence, and isn't committed to the fight. Pretty soon, you have a mutiny." Critique of the Conservative and Reform Parties: The authors apply the above principles to critique the contemporary political landscape. The Conservative party is portrayed as lacking a defined purpose or identity, leading to apathy and disengagement among its supporters. "This, ultimately, is why the Tories and Reform are defunct parties. Nobody is able to say what the Tory party is for, nobody understands it, and nobody wants to fight for it. Its leader doesn't even realise there's a war on." Reform is seen as having a command structure but lacking substance, policies, and generals who are not actually committed to pursuing any policies, just slogans. WOTE.uk as an Alternative: While not explicitly stated as the primary focus, the piece implicitly positions WOTE.uk as a viable alternative, offering "efficient and common sense government without the millstone of dogmatic politics." This can be interpreted as WOTE.uk is clear on its purpose and not taking activists for granted. Key Quotes:"An effective organisation is one where the people of the front lines know what they are doing and why - are properly equipped - and are respected by their leaders." "During WW2, they knew what they were doing and why they were fighting. Fast-forward to Vietnam, where there was no clear basis for the war, no coherence to operations, no discernible plan, and their lives were being wasted." "When there was so little hope of achieving anything, it was not unknown for soldiers to murder their officers." "You cannot expect activists to go out into the street to a sell a party that doesn't have a coherent purpose or policies to speak of." "This, ultimately, is why the Tories and Reform are defunct parties. Nobody is able to say what the Tory party is for, nobody understands it, and nobody wants to fight for it. Its leader doesn't even realise there's a war on." "It's attracting disillusioned foot soldiers who are desperate for any leadership." "WOTE.uk aims to provide efficient and common sense government without the millstone of dogmatic politics." Implications:The piece suggests a potential vulnerability for established political parties, particularly among disillusioned voters and activists. It highlights the importance of clear communication, strong leadership, and a well-defined purpose in attracting and retaining support. It serves as a promotional piece for WOTE.uk, implicitly positioning it as an alternative for those dissatisfied with the status quo. Potential Questions for Further Investigation:What are the specific policies and objectives of WOTE.uk that address the perceived shortcomings of the Conservative and Reform parties? How does WOTE.uk plan to engage and motivate its members, and how does it differ from the perceived failures of the established parties? What is the membership and support base of WOTE.uk, and what are its prospects for future growth and influence?

Picking battles wisely

Making Britain Great Again

Chris Martz provides advice for climate catastrophists. Things just got tougher for climate alarmists. 😱Remember when Iceberg A-68 calved off Antarctica's Larsen C Ice Shelf in the summer of 2017? The climate chicken littles blamed it on global warming. 🐔Well, unfortunately for their alarm, a study published in Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) in November has cast some serious doubt on that claim. MacKie et al. (2024) found:📊 The break-off of Iceberg A-68 from the Larsen C Ice Shelf was 𝒏𝒐𝒕 statistically exceptional.🛰️ There has been 𝒏𝒐 increase in size of the annual largest iceberg calving off of Antarctica since satellite measurements began in 1976.🧊 Using a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution model, it is revealed that there could, in a theoretical sense, be calving events that produce icebergs several times larger than anything observed in the 47-year-long satellite era, and even if that were to occur, such an event could not necessarily be tied to man-made global warming. These have already occurred throughout the Holocene (e.g., Bentley et al., 2005).🔗MacKie et al. (2024): <a data-mce-href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL112235" href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL112235">https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL112235</a>🔗Bentley et al. (2005): <a data-mce-href="https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/33/3/173/29528/Early-Holocene-retreat-of-the-George-VI-Ice-Shelf" href="https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/33/3/173/29528/Early-Holocene-retreat-of-the-George-VI-Ice-Shelf">https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/33/3/173/29528/Early-Holocene-retreat-of-the-George-VI-Ice-Shelf</a>Here's an excerpt from the new paper,🗨️ “𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘-𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑜𝑓 𝐴68 𝑖𝑛 2017 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒏𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂 𝒔𝒚𝒎𝒑𝒕𝒐𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆. 𝐼𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡, 𝐴68 𝑖𝑠 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒖𝒏𝒆𝒙𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑, 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 1986 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2020.”The authors also underscore important dynamics about ice sheet behavior in that these kinds of calving events are indicative of healthy glacier advance and retreat, not necessarily ice sheet instability.🗨️ “𝐴𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ, 𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝒆𝒙𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒖𝒕𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡.”While basal melting increases the rate of ice calving, and calving event frequency did increase around 2015-16 (see here: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/4583/2021/), what this study underscores is that extreme iceberg calving events in Antarctica are not necessarily due to climate change and therefore shouldn't be treated as the poster child for it.Despite these findings, the next time you hear “An iceberg the size of Rhode Island broke off Antarctica last week,” it will be blamed on your SUV. <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1888745544060985412" href="https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1888745544060985412">Chris Martz on Twitter</a> ..read the replies and followup

Arctic Sea Ice: don't panic

Here Pete North channels Donald Trump and Mr Punch, and imagines what @KemiBadenoch should have said in that interview:"There can be no doubt that the last Conservative government was an abject failure, for which there is no excuse. I can't even begin to apologise and would not insult anyone's intelligence by doing so. But we do get it. We will fix this mess. Labour won't. Reform wouldn't know how. We have a plan. Let me tell you what the plan is.First and foremost, the era of judges dictating our energy and immigration policy is over. We're scrapping the ECHR and the Human Rights Act. We're leaving the Refugee Convention and we're quitting the Paris Agreement. Only Westminster will legislate on these issues. We're already writing the draft legislation. We know there will be fallout. We're ready for it, and we're ready to take on the EU if we have to. We'll finish the job of Brexit. &nbsp;On the matter of asylum, other than Ukraine, there are no wars in our immediate sphere. There is no reason we should have an asylum system at all. We will reduce is to a discretionary system capped at 500 a year aimed at providing sanctuary for political dissidents. Anyone who arrived by dinghy should make arrangements to go home because otherwise, they're going to be leaving on an A400M to the Falklands for an indeterminate stay. We will have a basic camp established within six weeks. We'll have no more foot-dragging and we'll sack anyone who gets in the way.&nbsp;Further to this, we will abolish indefinite leave to remain and no foreign-born individual will be entitled to benefits of any kind. We'll do whatever it takes to reverse the Boriswave. Where countries refuse to take back migrants, they can expect to be hit with a whole array of sanctions including tariffs, and taxes on remittances. We'll stop any flights from even landing in Britain.&nbsp;We will take the immigration function away from the Home Office to set up a specialist ICE style entity. The message is clear. If you're here illegally, we'll find you and deport you. We'll offer generous rewards for information and put investigators on commission. This department will work round the clock. There will be no appeals. There will be daily deportation flights.&nbsp;Further to this, we're no longer going to tolerate Islamism and sectarianism. We're going to consider the terror watch list a deportation list. Any mosque known to have repeatedly hosted hate preaches will be turned into a car park, and we're banning the burka. You can expect to see more measures along these lines. If you want to live according to Islamic tradition, you can't do it here. We're also going to ban the hate marches. Anyone showing open support for terrorist organisations will be jailed, and if they're foreign born, they'll be deported. Multiculturalism is over. No more cultural exceptions, no more two-tier policing, no more leniency, no more cultural relativism. There'll be no more translation services and if you can't pass an English fluency test (written and oral), your days here are numbered. &nbsp;&nbsp;As to legal immigration, we're going to cap it at zero. Britain doesn't need any more immigration. If business doesn't have the skill base, they must start training people. The government will assist in this. We will revert second rate universities to polytechnics. We must train our own people and get them off benefits. What we haven't got, we'll do without. But there's nothing we can't do. There's a reason the world wants to send its youth to elite British universities.&nbsp;Meanwhile, we're going to fix the economy. We will repeal net-zero targets and the climate change act. We're scrapping the EV and heat pump mandates. We're going to get energy bills right down and you can expect to see change within six months. We're phasing out renewables subsidies and no more windfarms or solar parks will be built. We will grant every drilling licence application. Judges won't get a say in it. We're going to scrap carbon taxes, and you can expect to see your bills fall by at least a third. We're scrapping the climate change committee too. We will purge the regressive green ideology from all arms of government.&nbsp;We're then going to clean up our streets. We're no longer going to turn a blind eye to casual drug use and petty crime. We're going to get the rubbish off our streets. We're going to abolish landfill taxes and put an end to fly tipping. We'll shut down the money laundering front shops. We'll clean up the high streets. We'll put lenient judges on notice. They will be held accountable, as will police chiefs.&nbsp;We're then going to clean up government. We'll establish our own DOGE. We'll root out DEI and wokery from all arms of government, and we'll cut the waste. Men will not be considered women in any guise. FCDO grants will be cancelled unless a project has a demonstrable contribution to controlling immigration. We expect to uncover billions in waste. We'll return it to you in the form of tax cuts. We're not going to be wreckers, but we are going to be ruthless.&nbsp;These are our broad aims. I'm building a team to expand and enhance this policy platform, and more detail will follow. The underpinning approach to policy will be "no more half-measures - and no more appeasing the left or the media". We'll do what it takes. The previous government failed because we tried to stay within the existing frameworks - but they no longer work for us. We prized international law over the direct national interest. We've hidden behind bureaucracy to excuse our inaction. That all ends under my leadership." <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1888946736707822005" href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1888946736707822005">From Twitter</a>

That's the way to do it...

Northern variant - @FUDdaily&nbsp; from <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1887879440404750369" href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1887879440404750369" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Twitter</a><h3>So how long before "Close, AND a cigar?" </h3>Well, it worked for Churchill... so it's worth a little thought exercise on how @KemiBadenoch &nbsp;could turn things around for the Tories. Her party's two basic problems are credibility and trustworthiness. To build credibility she needs to be rid of the toxic, the deadbeats and the hasbeens. Priti Patel, for instance, cannot be anywhere near the front bench. Her political career should be over.&nbsp;Badenoch says the party is changing. If she wants people to believe it, we need to see proof. The ambiguity is a killer. Activists and influencers won't wait two years for positions and policy. We need to know what the party stands for now. General vibes aren't good enough. The party needs to be explicit about what it will do.&nbsp;<figure id="figure-9xbakquhim6uyyjrg"><img id="9xbakquhim6uyyjrg" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/15opazAphcznySZFtb95u9lgOlMJ6UW6QajK6kHLk0K6BmpnJIuE1Jj24oo7z1LZ.jpg" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined% 20%;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined%" data-positiony="20%" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/15opazAphcznySZFtb95u9lgOlMJ6UW6QajK6kHLk0K6BmpnJIuE1Jj24oo7z1LZ.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined% 20%;"></figure>If we are to believe that the party has changed then we need a clear indication that Net Zero targets will be repealed. The party must be clear that no more land will be gobbled up by solar panels and no more windfarms will be built on land or at sea. The EV mandate must be scrapped, along with all heat pump measures. We don't want or need them. &nbsp;&nbsp;Repeatedly Rishi Sunak stood at a podium with the slogan "stop the boats". He stopped short of taking the full measures available to him to ensure the deterrence scheme would work. Voters will tolerate no more half-measures. We need to see a plan that repeals the HRA, neuters the ECHR, renounces the Refugee Convention and takes the courts out of political decision-making.&nbsp;<h3>This has to be bold. We're not going to put up with "we'll decide when the time comes".</h3> The public wants an end to it. Migrants arriving at Dover should be on an aeroplane out of the country within 72 hours - whether it's to the Falklands or Rwanda or their country of origin. Nobody cares where, so long as it's not here.On immigration, nobody wants to hear any waffle about "integration". The time to have that conversation was twenty years ago. Now that we have Islamist sectarianism entering all areas of politics, it's time it is eradicated. The state has to put them on notice.&nbsp;On benefits, no immigrant should be entitled to benefits or housing ever. If they failed to establish themselves and are not able to financially support themselves, they must go home.&nbsp; We do not have the resources to look after our own people, never mind the world's detritus - or "flotsam" - to be accurate.On infrastructure, we need action now. Whatever it is that causes years of delay and budget bloat, repeal it. We cannot have judges deciding whether we can build a power station or a runway. We cannot have blob NGOs calling the shots. On that note, NGOs must be defunded.&nbsp;<h3>We can have no more guessing games or policy triangulation by focus group. Decide what is right and argue the case.</h3>As to outflanking Reform, that shouldn't be too difficult. Reform, fundamentally, is a populist party. They will promise the world on a stick. What they lack is credibility. There is no outward sign that they know what they're doing. There's no sign of a plan. If they publish policy at all, it's likely to be half-baked, simplistic and rushed. The answer to that is to simply do better. Which isn't hard. &nbsp;&nbsp;Badenoch has said we shouldn't expect policy for two years. Fair enough. Detail takes time. But we do need to see an unequivocal agenda. We do need to know whether Badenoch gets it. We do need to know if the party is heading in the right direction. We need to know that the party understands the scale and the urgency of the problems, and we need to know the party has the stones to do what is necessary regardless of how the media whines.&nbsp;Right now, right-leaning voters have no reason to trust the Tory party. They have no reason to care whether it lives or dies. There is no reason to even pay attention to it. We know what we want. We're just looking for someone to deliver it. We've seen what's been done in America just with the political will, and we want that to happen here. Only for us, the choice is between the amateurism of Reform or the treachery of the Tories.The only way to prove that the Tories have changed is to be decisive and make a clean break with the past. No more compromises. No more pandering to the liberal wing. No more "middle way". It's now do or die for the Tory party. If being robust and decisive upsets the liberal wing, then do it anyway, because the alternative is extinction.&nbsp;Voters will eventually make their own minds up. They will take a punt on Reform's empty sloganeering and hope for the best if there is no real alternative. The answer is to be a better alternative. Show people the party has the right ideas and the answers. Show people the party is serious. Otherwise, 2029 is the end for the Tory party - and no-one will care <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1887879440404750369" href="https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1887879440404750369" target="_blank" rel="noopener">from Twitter</a> <a data-mce-href="https://veo.uk/ToryPartyRevival.mp3" href="https://veo.uk/ToryPartyRevival.mp3" data-mce-selected="inline-boundary">Audio AI analysis and commentary&nbsp;﻿</a>

The WOTE.uk Federation 2025

Blog: the Revolution starts here...

Picking battles wisely

Making Britain Great Again

Arctic Sea Ice: don't panic

That's the way to do it...

Can the Tories become relevant again?

A Vote of No Confidence