Blog

* Updated in the light of the unexpected rate at which the true character of Starmer's government is becoming apparent. Remember Ronald Reagan once said that "if fascism ever comes to the United States it will arrive in the guise of liberalism"?&nbsp; Well, that prediction continues to unfold, and be proven accurate. Anyone that opposes any of the Marxist diktats is "far right" - and their faces will be stored in big brother's facial recognition systems - along with DNA records and anything else that can be accumulated. "All the&nbsp; better to track you with... " So will hoodies, burkas and other religious coverings be outlawed?Listen up chaps. Starmergeddon is much more serious than most people realise, Andrew Neil has got the Marxist plot in his latest daily mail feature - and the antibodies of the left are busy seeking out all criticism of Starmer and his fellow travellers. A veritable cytokine storm of cynical indignation descends on anyone daring to question the choice of his appointments. Now let's see how quickly this most bogus of election victories can be contained and sanity restored. Andrew Neil summed it up... <h3><a data-mce-href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13604625/ANDREW-NEIL-triumph-New-Establishment-Leftie-lawyer-Downing-Street-seized-piece-jigsaw.html" href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13604625/ANDREW-NEIL-triumph-New-Establishment-Leftie-lawyer-Downing-Street-seized-piece-jigsaw.html">Final triumph of the New Establishment: Now with a Leftie lawyer in Downing Street, they've seized the last piece of the jigsaw...</a> </h3>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13604625/ANDREW-NEIL-triumph-New-Establishment-Leftie-lawyer-Downing-Street-seized-piece-jigsaw.htmlThe new administration is off to a solid start of pious hypocrisy and ludicrous appointments. Politicians cannot help themselves. Pass the sick bag.I asked an AI image bot to generate a picture of someone throwing up in a bucket - but it wouldn't let me. So I modified the description to a stuffed toy covering its mouth to pass the acceptability test. And ended up with the mutant creature at the top of this page. But there are various interesting PR stunt opportunities – I favour citizens' arrests under the bribery act that says that attempting to buy votes with cash or promises is illegal. Which must mean any politicians are guilty. Grok agrees…“…Trying to buy votes in the UK with cash or gifts is a big no-no, just like it is in the US. It's against the law, specifically the Representation of the People Act 1983. This law makes it clear that offering or accepting money or gifts in exchange for votes is a criminal offence. So, if you're caught trying to sway voters with cash or promises, you could be facing a fine and up to a year in the slammer.But wait, there's more! The law also applies to those who solicit, accept, or receive such bribes. So, if you're the one offering the goodies, and the voter happily takes the bait, you're both in hot water.Now, I know what you're thinking – "But what if I just really, really want that policy?" Well, I hate to break it to you, but the law doesn't care. It's all about maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.“It's really not a case of being a bad loser, but of helping to save the bogus "winners" from being strung up by all those cheated by the outrageous exploitation of a voting system that cannot be justified any longer. There are a lot of them: 66% of the Electorate. The silenced majority (literally) must demand a recount and review of missing postal votes, and election interference. Especially the Channel 4 stitch-up that started the phony canvasser hare running. Election fraud has become media sport during this election.&nbsp;<h3>We also need to review of every one of the major hoaxes of the past ten years that have been shaping the misleading and costly policies driving climate, health, defence, education, law and farming. Especially the malign influence of Big Pharma pumping us full of their untested potions.&nbsp;</h3>How could any sentient being watching Joe Biden - the man with the atomic launch codes - being allowed to stumble along? Surely this proves that Reagan's predicted "fascist liberals" have overtaken Western democracy. <figure id="figure-zq16on84m8lyd2h9m2"><iframe id="zq16on84m8lyd2h9m2" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Y2sMoykZ-lM" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/Y2sMoykZ-lM" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Y2sMoykZ-lM" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe></figure>What is going on? How deep does this lunacy run in our society? (cf Yuri Bezmenov)Look what happened when somebody eventually raised the lid and saw what sort of creatures crawled out from the Post Office inquiry. And one of those involved is now in charge of a party of some 70 MPs!&nbsp;We must call for a time-out and a pause to repair the tattered credibility of British democracy - and its sinisterly subversive establishment - while there is still a chance.&nbsp;So let's develop the simple e-voting ideas being set out on this site to return (some) power to the people.We also need to ask @OfCom to explain how GBN gets tagged for imbalance, when the BBC, C4 and ITV do what they want. So I also asked an AI bot to digest 30 mins of the BBC news channel, and find a photographic depiction of its respect for its audience... it again refused to be rude, so here's a REAL BBC image of Myram Moshiri.V2.2&nbsp; 08jul24<figure id="figure-neor65b9fmly91orbk" class=""><img id="neor65b9fmly91orbk" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/29IVqyWqknR1qNf6oVu4jra0K9VB6wqJuFXAfYJbEzleoRYHNgWtFlKNvDep7SlK.jpg" alt="Voting in an Election" title="Voting in an Election" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/29IVqyWqknR1qNf6oVu4jra0K9VB6wqJuFXAfYJbEzleoRYHNgWtFlKNvDep7SlK.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;"></figure>

the Silenced Majority must be a bad loser!

James Melville nails the issues in <a data-mce-href="https://x.com/JamesMelville/status/1819071300284858690" href="https://x.com/JamesMelville/status/1819071300284858690" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a twitter post</a> after a month of Starmergeddon... is he going to have Larry bleached to remain in character?&nbsp; Ronnie sets the scene: for "America" hear "United Kingdom"...<figure id="figure-60r4md60jclzcr9v1i" data-full-width=""><iframe id="60r4md60jclzcr9v1i" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/b-T8oC8SLFI" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/b-T8oC8SLFI" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="true" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/b-T8oC8SLFI" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe></figure><h2>They are playing us.&nbsp;</h2>Almost everything in our news cycle is questionable. The lines between fact and fiction have become blurred. What our leaders and mainstream media peddle as the truth is often misinformation. And what is really the truth is smeared as misinformation. In an era of rolling news and social media, the bamboozle has captured us. In particular, our ‘elites’ masquerading their greed as virtue.The modern world is a simulacrum, where reality has been replaced by false messaging and imagery, to such an extent that one cannot distinguish between fact and fiction. And as a result of this, everyone squabbles through the prism of their own confirmation biases and ideological impulses.We are ruled by a nefarious group of individuals that have an unquenchable thirst for power, control and money, and they don’t care what they have to do to get it. And that includes tricking people into thinking they are the virtuous good guys who are here to keep us all safe. And tragically, millions of people are completely duped by this. What we have witnessed over the Covid response, the war in Ukraine, the Net Zero agenda on climate change and many other current issues is a movement of faux-virtue that has been carefully crafted by corrupt politicians, messengers within legacy media outlets, greedy corporations, messiah delusional billionaires and undemocratic technocrats to create the impression that they are the virtuous ones who are our friends.&nbsp;These people are not our friends. Their primary objective is to hoodwink us into believing and complying to their virtue, but in reality being tricked into giving away more freedoms, power, wealth and assets to these virtue vultures.&nbsp;The reality of all of this is that we are sleepwalking towards the biggest asset grab in the history of the planet. They are trying to destroy farms, land, businesses, freedoms, housing, individual wealth, travel and own them or sell them off to the highest bidder. And at the same time, they are trying to ring-fence society into the entrapment of being controlled by data – either through health passports or the slow mission creep towards central banking digital currencies (CBDCs). It’s a giant asset grab of what we own and control. They frame all of this being in our best interests. But it’s the biggest swindle ever.This gargantuan virtue con-trick also comes with a huge slice of authoritarianism. Anyone who sees through it, questions it, stands up to it or shows opposition to it are immediately ridiculed and ostracised by the group-think mob:Question the Covid response?&nbsp; “Covidiot”Question the wars?&nbsp; “Putin apologist” “Antisemite”Question net zero?&nbsp; “Climate change denier” “Far-right”<h3>This is gutter politics designed to shut down and undermine any opposition or questioning.&nbsp;</h3>But not questioning the narrative is a huge form of denial. Because any government, technocrat or institution that advocates medical discrimination, suppression of civil liberties and a transfer of wealth and public assets to the rich while the rest of society endures a cost of living crisis is not your friend.&nbsp;<h3>Don’t be fooled by their virtue. It’s a giant con. In reality, they are indulging in a massive asset grab. They are treating the world as feudalism, but under the guise of “it’s for your own good” or “safety” faux virtue. A Machiavellian weapon that power hungry sociopaths use for control.&nbsp;</h3>Fake virtue peddled by governments and authorities for mass compliance and social control is oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook. Don’t be fooled by it. Because when totalitarianism arrives, it will come cloaked in fake virtue. [Per Ronald Reagan's famous quote] We can all use a laugh... Reagan jokes about Communism, Soviet, Liberals, Big Government, himself and warns us about Putin <figure id="figure-xxbfhfnon6lzcr5bxs" class=""><iframe id="xxbfhfnon6lzcr5bxs" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ntct2R7XQW0" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/ntct2R7XQW0" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ntct2R7XQW0" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe></figure>

James Melville explains Starmer's evil plot

Another challenge to the climate cult from Chris Martz (US perspective), who does not hold back ... <a href="https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1818032783396397492" data-mce-href="https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1818032783396397492">https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1818032783396397492</a> We make no apology for focusing on this subject since it is driving the economies of the West to make huge sacrifices and compromises over budget considerations, also than the UK where mad Ed Milliband has already made some expensive mistakes since taking office on July 5th. The call for evidence from Chris comes in the wake of David Siegel's long-term campaign for an honest debate - but we're still waiting for honest answers from the Cult. "... Here are 10 questions for climate Nancy boys.➊ To the nearest hundredth of a degree Celsius, what is the “correct” global mean surface temperature (GMST), and why?➋ If your answer to question one is “the pre-industrial climate,” then explain to me why a 1.2°C cooler planet would be ideal for life on Earth in terms of agricultural and economic productivity. Explain to me why climate conditions during the Little Ice Age (LIA) would be less dangerous and more preferable?➌ What is the “correct” amount of extreme weather? How many tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes; tornadoes; single-cell, multi-cell cluster, multi-cell line and supercell thunderstorms; damaging wind and hailstorms; droughts; coastal, pluvial and flash floods; heatwaves and cold waves; snowstorms, ice storms and blizzards; and wildfires should there be per year globally? Assign exact numbers then explain to me why.➍ What is the “correct” level of atmospheric carbon dioxide supposed to be? What dry-air volume or even range of concentrations would minimize bad weather and optimize plant growth? Most alarmists tell me that the pre-industrial level of 180-280 ppm is ideal. But, why? Show me the data that can physically establish a mathematical relationship between carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere and the amount of tornadic or hurricane activity in a year, for starters, then explain why 180-280 ppm is more ideal for plants than 800-1,200 ppm.➎ Climate scientists say that the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which President Biden signed into law last year, was the “biggest piece of climate legislation in history.” But, since it was signed into law, the climate alarmists say that climate change has only become a lot worse. Why?➏ To follow-up to question five, when will the IRA be effective? At 6:24 p.m. today? Noon tomorrow? Next week? 5-years from now? When will it give us the ideal climate? What does that look like? How do we know, and by what measure(s)?➐ If the U.S. spends $50-78 trillion to decarbonize our economy by 2050, how much will that reduce GMST by 2100, if we assume climate model projections are an accurate representation of reality? Provide your answer to the nearest hundredth of a degree Celsius and show me your math.➑ If you don't know the answer to question eight, here is a follow-up. If you don't know how much GMST will be reduced by 2100 if we go to “net zero” emissions by 2050, are we supposed to spend $50-78 trillion and just see what happens? That would cost each of you between $150,000 and $235,000 to achieve.<h3>➒ China and India emit more carbon dioxide into the air than any other country. Why are their feet never held to the fire to reduce emissions? Why does the responsibility only fall on western countries, and all of a sudden the topic goes from total emissions to the per capita metric?</h3>➊⓿ Why do efforts to mitigate negative impacts of man-made climate change focus almost exclusively on reducing emissions, as opposed to more effective (especially in the near-term) measures, such as better zoning codes in flood plains; investing in weather-resilient infrastructure along our coastlines and in hail and tornado alley; better city planning to reduce flash flooding damage; or placing power lines underground and improving forest management to reduce fire risk?I'm still waiting for climate alarmists to answer these very basic questions in a clear and concise manner..."We all are, then we can ask the people for an informed decision on how our priorities should be ranked, and pass that decision onto their MPs - to test their willingness to engage with - and acknowledge - the will of the Electorate.

challenge the climate cultists

The effort to analyse what has gone wrong with the UK is in high gear as we wonder how a government with the direct support of just one in five of the electorate, is sneaking us back the 70s with nationalisation, the politics of envy and a Joe Stalin tribute act whose father was a toolmaker - whilst claiming to have won a landslide mandate. 3O% of the votes translate to 60% of commons seats, so why is no one raising hell? Is there a cunning plan being hatched to dump this "illegitimocracy" when the time is right? Let them get carried away with hubris whilst the silenced majority gets its act together..? Sadly, the Opposition is presently shambolic. Sunak doesn't need the money, and how it shows! He's mainly concerned with looking like a good loser who is helpfully handing over without being awkward or getting in the way. How much money does his family software business earn from the UK government?)Maybe current events will force the issue and overtake Starmer's novice government - the Stockport murders could force the issue and see protests on the streets.&nbsp; From <a data-mce-href="https://thenewconservative.co.uk/taking-back-control/" href="https://thenewconservative.co.uk/taking-back-control/">the New Conservatives&nbsp;</a>&nbsp; https://thenewconservative.co.uk/taking-back-control/ <h3>Taking Back Control Politics / By Kim Rye</h3>I have been spending a lot of time in reflection recently. The outcome of the general election on 4th July filled me with an abject longing for the 20th century values we left behind. On the stroke of midnight 31st of December 1999, it seemed common sense, fortitude, bulldog spirit and pride in our culture died. The past had manners, dignity and respect. It had character, it had fun. It had beauty, wit, kindness and authenticity. It was optimistic, inventive, brave, courageous and forward-looking. People were grateful for what they had, even if it wasn’t a lot.All I feel now is fear for the future. Post-war Britain had its ups and downs, but there was a sense of optimism and anticipation. The 21st century is self-obsessed, selfish, depressing and worst of all consumed by ghastly “woke”.Everything now revolves around taking offence and victimhood, creating fear of saying or even thinking the wrong thing. There’s climate fearmongering, critical race theory, ludicrous and fabricated gender and identity politics, false narratives and blame culture, particularly “white privilege”, self-blame and introspection. All are products of the over-fertile imaginations of catastrophists, drama queens and, frankly, the lunatic fringe.The fun has been sucked out of life. Comedy for example, has been replaced by banal, depressing “Reality TV”. Whose reality? Modern TV programming promotes unrealistic aspirations, body dysmorphia and “mental health” fixation. There’s none of the fun of send-up comedy, gritty soaps and light-hearted drama that we knew and loved in previous decades.The mid to late 20th century had its problems, but it was authentic and aspirational and it had great music. If you’re over 25, name one great band of 2024?Twenty twenty-four is mired in doom and gloom; the country is in a dreadful state. Hostile cultures that want to take up residence here, but hate us and our way of life, are busy creating fear and oppression. The ‘politics of the subcontinent’, as Nigel Farage recently put it are being played out on the streets of Britain. For example, the disputes raging in Bangladesh are now being fought over in East London. They had nothing to do with this country; we cannot be the world’s policeman.Britain 2024 is now a miserable, supine backwater, comprised of individuals who take the knee and betray everything our noble forefathers fought for in two world wars. While our own belief systems are trashed, we allow ourselves to be subjugated by those who not only hate us, but devalue, erase and rewrite our history.The future looks grim. Give it 20 years and we will all be under the control of evil cults and false religions. Surely it hasn’t escaped your notice that it’s already happening? It began in 2020, with the biggest error of judgement ever: the response to Covid-19 and the reaction of the world government. The madness then escalated with the events surrounding the death of George Floyd.Next came the industrial scale self-loathing and apologism, as politicians and celebrities demanded we house the entirety of the Third World – those whose lives and livelihoods had reportedly been wrecked by the “evil West”. It is no small irony that the queue to enter such evil countries continues to grow, while the taxpayer bankrolls illegal migrants in four-star hotels and turns a blind eye to ex-servicemen sleeping in shop doorways.Meanwhile, genuine migrants who came to live alongside us with good intent, decent people of the Windrush for example, are also affected by these events. They are part of our culture. They came here and made Britain their home too. Look around this country now. “Demi paradise” it is not. The land of Shakespeare is now the land of obscure slang, bad manners and crudeness.<h3>So what do we do about it? Well, to start with, what we don’t do is spend pointless hours on social media engaging in digital civil war. We get out there and join with other like-minded individuals to change the system from within. Whatever your “conservative values” are, regardless of which political party you support, you need to nail your colours to the mast.</h3>People talk of revolution, but surely it would be preferable to fight the system from within rather than without? We need to put ourselves up as candidates in every by-election, local council election and general election we can. Why is it that people suppose there is a factory somewhere that manufactures politicians, ready-to-go robots, pre-programmed – although I grant you, that is how it looks!The truth is that whoever we are, the system in which we operate is managed by politicians. If we don’t like how they are running things, we need to change it ourselves. Masses of us up and down the country need to get active within our communities and start campaigning. You might ask, do I practice what I preach? Absolutely. I am already a local town councillor, and am putting myself up for next year’s county elections for Reform UK, having assisted their local campaign during the election period, helping their PPC for this area.The more of us true conservatives are on the inside, the more inspiration we can give to others and ensure that, come the next general election, we are able to field a huge crop of conservatives, be they Conservative or Reform UK candidates. I truly believe this will make an enormous difference, and if we make a big difference locally, perhaps we can convince the electorate to turn out to vote.The turnout at this year’s general election was only 52 percent. This is not good enough. Something similar happened in London in May. The mayoral election that granted Sadiq Khan a third term, saw almost 60 percent of Londoners fail to show up.However, there is hope. The Reform UK movement now stands at a record 70,000 members, including a significant number of young people. I am hopeful this will inspire the Conservative Party to re-acquaint themselves with their true conservative values. I am not suggesting a merger, but imagine the next Parliament with a massive collaboration of centre-right individuals. Even if Labour manage to get re-elected, imagine the opposition!As Winston Churchill famously said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.” We certainly have enough appeasers ready and willing to drag us back to the 7th Century, courtesy of our import of Islam. It is a united front of true conservatives that now needs to stand up and take back control; starting right here, right now. Kim Rye is a former Fleet Street copytaker. She is a sub-editor on 007 Magazine &amp; Archive.

If we could turn back time...

The Pantomime of ParliamentI am still not willing to accept the result of the bogus election, and nor should you be. A government with the support of one in five of the electorate is an affront to democracy, and we are now subject to government by an illegitimocracy.&nbsp; The main current challenge for Real Democracy UK is to to bang on about the democratic deficit, and suggest ways to engage with the electorate so that more people can be engaged and bothered to vote.I have been watching the King's Speech debate on BBC Parliament, wherein the new boys and girls give their maiden speeches with widely varying degrees of competence. Mostly thanks to their voters, the usual sniping about the predecessors, and the promises to perform miracles. Not a lot said about empowering individuals and companies - it is once again all about a command economy in the traditions of the defunct Soviet Union. Although I have some sympathy with the idea that British companies have mostly been fattened up for acquisition and flipping, . And after their speeches they hold fatuous votes where they wander off to the division lobbies.&nbsp; What a waste of time. Amendment K was predictably defeated by 385 to 82. Die hard parliamentarians insist that this apparently pointless tradition is an important way for all MPs to randomly encounter and discuss random matters. The fact that it now represents a wanton waste of time and public money is another example of the basic reform required in the philosophy of modernizing democracy. And goodness me, the concept of democracy has been mutilated, misrepresented and mauled just about every where since 2020 and the onset of the hoaxes designed to test the gullibility of the people. The manipulative hard core of those who now control the messaging media are only being moderated by a heroic Elon Musk who bravely sticks to the idea that free speech matters. The USA is deep in the middle of a mockery of gerrymandering, voting irregularities, and downright fantasy gaslighting. and now state commissioned assassination?&nbsp; The EU has always made its interpretation of democracy up as it went along, to suit the purposes of the Bilderberg/WEF agenda, with no hint of irony. But now the UK has fallen - with the ludicrous notion that 30% of the votes should be allowed to control 60% of the HoC. The first job of the new government and its compliant civil service will be to enshrine this state of affairs in such a way that there is no danger of it being undone by the combination of former Conservative voters with the Reform party, to represent the silenced majority.Yes, lobby voting may be traditional, but what an outrageous and wanton waste of time and public money when there are more pressing matters to attend to. Overall, nothing of substance was achieved (as expected) and a number of minor axes were ground - the adjournment debate led by Labour's Tonia Antoniazzi ranted on for 30 minutes about Commercial Sexual Exploitation. A very worthy concern, but clearly Labour's foetus MP, <a data-mce-href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c16jpl6707eo" href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c16jpl6707eo">Sam Carling</a>, was somewhat taken aback by lurid stories of blowjobs and squirmed uncomfortably throughout. I guess even MPs need work experience. Jess Phillips then spent a further 10 minutes explaining the difference between prostitution and commercial sexual exploitation.Young Sam looked like he needed a stiff drink and a talk from matron about the birds and bees. <img id="78db4mketddlyyse6gh" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/33XAOolZpX1NnIA1kDWCHmtx5z3OLRpPYTVRAbMbZ35dEUdvgxW3tTRV4z5xXgrM.jpg" alt="Table decoration of beautiful tasty food on celebration day." title="Table decoration of beautiful tasty food on celebration day." class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/33XAOolZpX1NnIA1kDWCHmtx5z3OLRpPYTVRAbMbZ35dEUdvgxW3tTRV4z5xXgrM.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" style="font-family: var(--body-fontFamily); font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); font-weight: var(--body-fontWeight, 400); aspect-ratio: 16 / 9; object-position: center center;"> And then when the Commons clocked off at 8 20pm. Attention switched to the House of Lords where we see a Liberal Democrat Peer holding forth, but not about why LDs have enjoyed more than 80 Lords seats even when their HoC numbers would have barely filled a taxi. The indulgence of the LDs in the Lords needs to be balanced with other parties with larger numbers of votes at the general election.This might take a while... They are very comfortably ensconced for now. <figure id="figure-dkipb47038lyyta5v4" class=""><img id="dkipb47038lyyta5v4" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/2enLXX0YRxFPLzv1Vx1hcuGrDUuQjEV25O8yFGxMuXsrahJzW0p6mqATTnjCMAz2.jpg" alt="Lord Scriven" title="Lord Scriven" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined undefined;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/2enLXX0YRxFPLzv1Vx1hcuGrDUuQjEV25O8yFGxMuXsrahJzW0p6mqATTnjCMAz2.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined undefined;"></figure>

The Pantomime Parliament

<h3>The new Labour government is every bit is delusional as we feared. The nanny state has never been an answer, especially now .. </h3>Peter Dawe analyses...This government will solve everything! Allegedly... The current UK political narrative is that the new government will solve all its inherited problems. Climate, food security, poverty, migration, every health issue known to man, transport … you name it, It is a government problem, It’s for the government to solve it. WRONG! The government does nothing useful, at best, it seeks to direct the efforts of its population and its corporations (both public and private). ALL THE WORK AND ALL THE INVESTMENT DONE BY YOU! You must make or buy the materials for the “Energy Transition” You must nurse the sick and infirm You must go into the fields and grow our food You must go out and fill the potholes … I go further, It is your duty to balance your outgoing against you income It is your duty to care for your children It is your duty to care for your elderly relatives It is your responsibility to live a healthy lifestyle …And that is only the beginning of a trip into the real world that Labour's legions of ingénues will be discovering at our cost.. A large part of this delusion arises from the way in which the inmates of Westminster are selected by a crazy system that has given the Labour Party the idea that with the support of just one in five of the electorate, they have been mandated to pursue Starmer's holy mission, steeped in the delusional socialist dogma of the failed 1970s. We really do have to rethink the way we choose our politicians, and how we can invoke and engage the enthusiasm and the skills required -and that's what the realdemocracy.uk site is seeking to help bring about.

WOTE.uk

Blog: the Revolution starts here...

the Silenced Majority must be a bad loser!

James Melville explains Starmer's evil plot

challenge the climate cultists

If we could turn back time...

The Pantomime Parliament

Starmergeddon beckons...