Labour's Election Fraud
A wise man once said - "if you try to chase after two rabbits, you will end up catching neither...."
We need to pause and consider the dissipation of attention and effort across the numerous new daily outrages by Starmer's government.
But there is no point is chasing even 5 of these new rabbits each day when there is just one rabbit that is at the centre of the problem, and needs to be taken down.
All effort needs to be focused on removing the main bunny and then holding an honest election.
His polling unpopularity is epic - never mind a momentary glitch from those gullible who were briefly distracted by the pantomime Trump State Visit.
My twitter crusade to get Labour MPs charged with #criminal_negligence_uk offences continues to explore and pile up evidence and ideas for private prosecutions of negligent politicians.
Now we learn that Morgan McSweeney was "advised to describe £700,000 in 'hidden' donations as a 'mistake' "
So let's look closer at bribery and election fraud offences as a way to disqualify MPs and force an election...
And start with the simple idea that votes were cynically bought with promises of good times ahead with Labour.
Get this one in the pot with some chopped carrots and onions...
So then I asked Grok to consider the question of bribery and electoral fraud where this government is concerned in view of the vast number of broken promises used to buy votes in July 24... Starting with a simple slam dunk ...
1/5: Labour's Wes Streeting: From WASPI hero to ghost—pledged justice for 3.8M 1950s women shafted by pension age hikes, clapped for protesters in 2018, signed the #WASPIpledge. Fast-forward to 2025: Crickets. Liz Kendall rejects £1-3K payouts despite Ombudsman slam.
Betrayal? Or "fiscal reality"? Women wait, bills pile up, judicial review looms Dec 9. Broken trust = broken democracy. Who's next? #WASPIScam #LabourLies
2/5: Pre-election: Starmer, Reeves, Rayner—all in on "righting the injustice." Manifesto? Silent. Now, winter fuel cuts & "no direct loss" excuses. X erupts: @J4m35c4mpb3ll
calls it "lie after lie," petitions hit 200K+. Tories even dunk: "Brass-neck dishonesty." Streeting's Ilford majority? Razor-thin—by-election bait?
3/5: Bribery Act angle? Pledges as "votes-for-justice bribes"?
Nah, courts call it puffery. But hypocrisy stings: UK jails for "hurty tweets" (RIP free speech), yet manifesto mirages slide. Real fix? Ballot box or binding laws. WASPI rally Sept '25—join the fight?
4/5: Sources: Ombudsman report £10.5B bill, DWP rejection Dec '24, High Court challenge. Scams prey on hope—DWP warns no payments yet. Women: "Cheated out of 6 yrs." Labour's majority wobbles—Reform sniffs blood.
5/5: Tag a MP who ghosted. Demand accountability. RT if you've had enough of pledge porn.
#HoldThemAccountable @WesStreeting
@LizKendall_CBE @Keir_Starmer
https://wote.uk/blog/wes-streeting---man-of-dishonour
Next stage of the crusade for accountable politics ...
Creatively Adapting Bribery & Fraud Laws: A "Pledge Prosecution" Playbook
Picture this: We dust off the Bribery Act 2010 and Fraud Act 2006, but remix them—stretching "improper performance" and "false representation" to snag those slippery manifesto vows.
Not literal law-bending (courts would scoff), but a determined, Streeting-style creative pivot: Treat election pledges as "quasi-contracts" in a voter "marketplace of trust."
Here's the imagined blueprint, weaponized for WASPI wrath: Bribery Act Hack (Section 1 Twist): Redefine the "financial advantage" as deferred equity—not cash, but the promise of £2,950 redress (Ombudsman's figure) to "induce" votes from a "relevant function" (the electorate as a collective public duty).
Intent? Prosecution infers it from the U-turn: Streeting's 2017 tweet + 2018 clap = knowing lure; 2024 rejection = improper non-performance. Penalty? Up to 10 years, plus disgorgement of "ill-gotten" salary (say, £122K MP pay since election).
Creative glue: Cite EU human rights precedents on "dignity in retirement" as the "corrupted function," arguing broken pledges erode societal integrity like corporate kickbacks.
Fraud Act Flex (Section 2: False Representation): Pledges aren't "puffery"—they're "material misstatements" with "dishonest intent" to gain office (the "benefit"). For WASPI: Streeting's pledge = representation of future action; rejection = gain (power) at voter loss (delayed pensions). Evidence? Timeline forensics: Pre-poll hype vs. post-poll silence.
Twist: Aggregate across MPs—class action for "conspiracy to defraud the franchise," tallying £10.5B "theft" in foregone redress. Courts "adapt" via equity jurisdiction: Mandate "truth audits" for manifestos, with AI-flagged U-turns triggering probes. In this fever-dream lit, a crowdfunded private prosecution (à la blog's satire) lands in CPS hands by Q1 2026.
Streeting testifies: "Ambition, not contract!" Judge retorts: "Voters aren't shareholders—you sold shares in hope." Boom—precedent for every broken bill-slash. Risk? Backlash as "sour grapes lawfare."
Reward? Chills future fibs. As creative as UK's tweet-arrests, but now we are executing the Will of the Electorate - not corrupt politicians exploiting Blair's legacy of tame police and judicial apparatchiks.