Blog

So after that train wreck of a budget that proved just about everything all the sensible commentators had feared -&nbsp; What does Labour actually want? Well, just look at what they're attacking.... we are back to the politics of envy to fund a lazy public sector. Starmer is gutting Number 10 of portraits of great Britons. They're kicking away the private school ladder so only the richest can afford it. They're smacking employers hard so there'll be fewer jobs. They're smacking landlords hard so there'll be fewer houses to let.&nbsp;They shooing away all our richest non-dom citizens to more friendly jurisdictions.They're smacking the national grid hard so their lobbyist mates get rich, and we can't afford heating. They're smacking the auto industry so we can't afford mobility. They're putting up fuel taxes so we can't afford to commute. They're putting up inheritance tax to prevent families growing stronger with each generation. They're rigging system to turn us into a one party state because they despise our democracy.&nbsp;They want us dependent on them. They want us poor, cold, immobile, precariously housed, and stupid. They want to erase who and what we are, and give equal rights to anyone who rocks up on a dinghy, because they hate the very idea of nation and nationality - and they don't care if they hand it all over to Islamists and low IQ third-worlders because in their eyes, there is no lower form of life than a white British worker, and no country on earth more sinful than Britain. Even paedophiles have higher status in the Labour order. They'd fook us over even more if they thought they could get away with it. And they will try.&nbsp;The Tories were just passively incompetent, but Labour know exactly what they're doing. Their idea of social justice is to make everybody equally poor, demoralised and miserable. They're motivated only by envy, hatred and spite. We are ruled by evil psychopaths.Get those citizens' arrests under way. There are 411 Labour MPs to be charged under the bribery act. Start with Rachel Reeves. And it is entirely possible that those voters daft enough to fall for the bribe of a promise of no tax increases and reduced energy costs are actually equally culpable - if you check the bribery law.

What does labour want to do?

Pete North - aka Northern Variant -<a href="x.com/@FUDdaily" data-mce-href="x.com/@FUDdaily">@FUDdaily on twitter</a> - produces a stream of really valuable insights into the political miasma of our times.&nbsp; Conservatives - Britain's traditional silent majority that used to just get on with the job of keeping society functioning - need to wake up and realise the fight they are in. You all need to get involved and slow down the train wreck of Starmer's government until it can be fully derailed and replaced with a functional model of sane government that works for ALL the people.This is a war on liberalism. All of it. Society is screwed because "they" perverted the natural order of things. They undermined the family with welfare, easy divorce, gay marriage, anti-family tax policies, and (neo)liberal feminism. Well, kids, the family is the cornerstone of society, and when you destroy that basic architecture, replacing the family with individually tailored state welfarism, society collapses. They undermined the value and importance of experience in the drive to marginalize the value of older (and more naturally conservative) members of society. We are witnessing it in real time. This is why London is a bloodbath, this is why fertility is collapsing, and this is why nothing works.&nbsp;Though they say "diversity makes us stronger", it hasn't done that anywhere -&nbsp; not in the community and not in the workplace. We have "diversified" all our key strategic interests so that even the power grid is run by token ethnic minorities and women, and now we can't even keep the lights on. (<a data-mce-href="https://www.nationalgrid.com/responsibility/people/investing-our-people-building-skills-clean-energy-future/creating-inclusive-culture" href="https://www.nationalgrid.com/responsibility/people/investing-our-people-building-skills-clean-energy-future/creating-inclusive-culture">Creating an inclusive culture | National Grid Group )</a>If you don't have strong families, you don't have community, and you don't have a society to speak of, and if you don't have electricity you don't have an economy, you can't make anything, and you can't export anything. As a country we have gutted the core institutions necessary for a functioning society and economy.&nbsp;Consequently, we now have a country run by childless gay men, foreigners, and brain-dead liberal women to the extent we won't even take the basic steps to defend our own borders, and we allow ourselves to be colonised by low-IQ third worlders.&nbsp;The common theme here is that every policy measure since the 1980s has been designed to marginalise white men - the core of the "middle class", and turn mothers into obedient workers who spend more time commuting than with their own children. Liberalism has won while we have been lulled into a trance by the endless process of divide, distract and rule that Blair encouraged to infiltrate and take over the education system, government communications. So now the BBC, Channel Four and ITV (and all commercial broadcasting) are social engineering projects that project a carefully contrived and intentionally misleading image of UK demographics.And now, kiddies, you have a morally, spiritually and intellectually depleted country, bankrupt politics, a stagnant economy, invading hordes taking over, a feminised bureaucratic military (on its last legs), and a national grid on the brink of collapse.&nbsp;This is liberal modernity. This is our fight. A fight in which we have no allies, and not even the Conservative party has our backs. Our institutions (all of them) have been turned against us. When you see the progress pride flag hanging outside town halls and hospitals they are telling you they have won (and they have). We are an occupied country - and it's time we realised that. We were conquered without a single shot being fired.

The root of the rot?

updated 11aug24 Before you are invited to spend time at His Majesty's pleasure (slung in jail) for a crime that didn't exist a week ago, please don't forget to leave a note to tell your friends what sort of cake you would like to be supplied with your escape file...<h2>But hold on a moment, you may find yourself sharing your cell with a politician...</h2>Most governments make a big thing of the need for law and order, discouraging those who want to short-circuit the democratic process with violent insurrection. In other words, preventing rioting with bricks and firebombs. Most citizens tend to agree with the use of state-sanctioned violence to stop rioting, as long as it is delivered within the context of a democratically chosen and accountable government.&nbsp;Now it starts to get awkward for the present Administration, which (presently) enjoys absolute control of parliament and its various functions, due to the support of just 20% of the electorate. Yes, 80% of the electorate had no say in the choice of Keir Starmer as PM. According to our arcane electoral process, this may be lawful in the view of the "law" and the fossils of Tony Blair's constitutional contrivance - the Supreme Court, which ultimately interprets the law and arbitrates its contradictions.&nbsp; &nbsp;So in the context of the row over differential two-tier policing, where the establishment of the tribes of US and THEM&nbsp;have divided the nation... at the behest of we're not quite sure who.&nbsp; Was that a Police decision to treat different communities differently, or are they acting on politicians' orders?Us is apparently all those who are not part of "them". The usual US suspects include those surrounding Ricky Jones, the Kent councillor who was inconveniently captured inciting a crowd of activist supporters in a woolly minded protest against racism and hate (ironically) to murder those loosely identified by Starmer as far right. Which led to (former) Kent Labour councillor Ricky Jones being suspended after telling a protest peace and harmony gathering in Walthamstow that Starmer's far right fascists need to have their throats cut.' Ricky Jones was filmed during a protest in east London, with the crowd cheering as he appeared to gesture slitting his throat, Oh dear.&nbsp;&nbsp; <figure id="figure-7xecfdpofblzoh3opp" class=""><iframe id="7xecfdpofblzoh3opp" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5CeaQqewH_o" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/5CeaQqewH_o" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5CeaQqewH_o" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe></figure>Keir Starmer introduced swift justice for those he snarlingly describes as "far right thugs", although justice for the policewoman in the Manchester airport incident with her broken nose, is still in abeyance at the time of writing. Now then, Lawfare - which presently seems to means the subjective manipulation and contrivance of law to create new forms of offence to persecute political opponents - should work both ways.&nbsp; So let's now consider a campaign of citizens' arrests under the <a data-mce-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bribery_Act_2010" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bribery_Act_2010" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bribery Act 2010</a> that says that attempting to buy votes with cash or promises is illegal. Which then must mean all politicians are guilty?&nbsp; The crime of bribery is described in Section 1 as occurring when a person offers, gives or promises to give a "financial or other advantage" to another individual in exchange for "improperly" performing a "relevant function or activity".&nbsp;&nbsp; As with much law, the interpretation can be quite subjective - so I checked with the AI engines of Gemini (google) and Grok (X - in playful mode)&nbsp; which agrees…“…Trying to buy votes in the UK with cash or gifts is a big no-no, just like it is in the US. It's against the law, specifically the Representation of the People Act 1983. This law makes it clear that offering or accepting money or gifts in exchange for votes is a criminal offence. So, if you're caught trying to sway voters with cash or promises, you could be facing a fine and up to a year in the slammer."But wait, there's more! The law also applies to those who solicit, accept, or receive such bribes. So, if you're the one offering the goodies, and the voter happily takes the bait, you're both in hot water.Now, I know what you're thinking – "But what if I just really, really want that policy?" Well, I hate to break it to you, but the law doesn't care. It's all about maintaining the integrity of the democratic process."The evidence is absolute and complete. Politicians were trying to do deals with electors to buy their votes throughout the entire election campaign. Plenty of video written and spoken evidence. And it's no good politicians saying that the law has never previously been applied in such a pre-emptive and Draconian manner - because that defence was dismissed instantly when tried on by those banged up in short order for hitherto unprecedented online "crimes". So why don't we use some of the facilities that are proving so successful in dealing with rioters, and have politicians rounded up and prosecuted for their crimes? Should we also consider the complicity of the police who have just been given a 4.75% pay award - hardly a bribe, but when hanging around doing nothing while waiting for trouble to show up, they will be paid overtime. So what about the apparently wildly exaggerated threat of nationwide riots that never happened - although police were standing/sitting by, collecting their overtime pay. (For completeness, the 4.75% increase is not payable until September 1st.) So all that happened on the nights when the UK was battened down and braced for impact was that the shock and awe tactics were credited with deterring virtually all far right violence from taking place. With no actual evidence to support the theory... it's amusing to speculate that the rumour of mass demos could have been put about by organised criminal gangs who would take advantage of the redeployment of regular police to go out and nick some more cars.&nbsp; (Surely not coppers after a bit of OT?)&nbsp; If we allow politicians to continue to make promises they do not keep, will we have a third tier to the policing process - to add to the one that goes after far-right demonstrators with Starmer fantasy "standing army" dressed in riot gear, and another tier that asks "protected communities" very politely to <a data-mce-href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/05/police-review-liaison-officer-muslims-weapons-mosque/" href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/05/police-review-liaison-officer-muslims-weapons-mosque/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">leave their weapons at the mosque </a>and -&nbsp;and if nothing is done about election bribery, there will be a third tier that does nothing at all when it comes to enforcing the bribery laws with politicians. This is an opportunity to make politicians behave responsibly and think about promises and ambiguous statements about "no new taxes"-&nbsp; in the same way that online keyboard warriors are being threatened over the consequences of their actions before they click the POST button.&nbsp;This may even spare members of the 20% tyranny from being strung up by the 80% of the electorate who will want compensation for having been pursued and convicted hammered after the outrageous exploitation of a demonstrably gameable voting system that needs root and branch reform. But we're open to plea bargaining - if the politicians come quietly and agree to implement a fairer voting format that will engage the whole of the electorate, and cannot be gamed to result in such absurdly skewed results and thus give us all some hope they can make a difference on an ongoing basis (check the WOTE suggestions on this site)&nbsp; then we can hold another election in which we can have some confidence of a fairer result.&nbsp; Or could that plea bargain be construed as a bribe? Oh dear, things get so messy when frenzied and righteous lawyers stomp over traditional rights and freedoms in jackboots, don't they? <h3>Last word (for now) to Grok... (playful mode) </h3>"A citizen's arrest is a fascinating concept, isn't it? However, before we get ahead of ourselves and start handcuffing politicians left and right, let's take a step back and consider the legal implications. In the United Kingdom, the Bribery Act of 2010 is indeed a thing, and it's not something to be trifled with. It makes it an offence to offer, promise, or give a bribe, as well as to request, agree to receive, or accept a bribe. But here's the kicker: the act doesn't explicitly grant you the power to perform a citizen's arrest based solely on a suspicion of bribery. That being said, if you witness a politician engaging in bribery, you can report the incident to the police. They'll investigate and, if necessary, arrest the politician.As for the politician's promises of favourable policies, well, that's just politics, isn't it? Politicians have been making promises they can't keep since the dawn of time. It's like a universal law of the universe or something. So, while you might be tempted to don your superhero cape and take the law into your own hands, it's probably best to leave the arrests to the professionals. Instead, you can channel your inner activist and work towards creating a more transparent and accountable political system. And who knows, maybe one day, politicians will actually keep their promises. But let's not hold our breath, shall we?"Funny you should say that, since that's exactly what this website is all about - realdemocracy.uk

doing the left and right thing with a third tier

Nothing to see here... 08AUG24 v1Well then, a damp squib or an imaginary squib? Whatever, the widely forecast arrival of the end of the world did not happen and the forces of moderate Britain were mobilized to the relief of all.Fearmongering has been a key feature of the manipulation of public opinion and mood since the outbreak of c19, and government has tested many tricks from the psyops playbook. <figure id="figure-7lcaqxscllzl0bok2" data-full-width=""><iframe id="7lcaqxscllzl0bok2" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z1EA2ohrt5Q" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/Z1EA2ohrt5Q" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="true" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z1EA2ohrt5Q" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe></figure>It's a good time to revisit the 1984 Yuri Bezmenov masterclass on the process of subversion, where the West has been encouraged to subvert itself from within.The analysis of what has really happened will be interesting. Will the review of faces seen at previous demonstrations include reviews of the pro Hamas anti-Israel events that marked the start of this phase of mass street confrontation.? All contentious issues such as the daily influx of ever more asylum seekers continue, while the idea of raising a voice in protest has become ever more awkward and uncomfortable - if you don't want to be flagged on the police database (on which you are already noted), and be put on "Tweet watch" for far right tendencies.Please never forget that we - the 80% silenced majority - are still being governed by the representatives of just 20% of the electorate with a choice that is made once every five years. Voting reform remains essential.Now for the big question ... did the 6000 police (the Starmtroopers)&nbsp; in reserve get paid overtime at the recently increased rates? Hmm..🤔... Cheers Kier...

nothing to see here...

August 7th 2023 20:40Paul Joseph Watson - aka <a data-mce-href="https://www.youtube.com/@AnythingGoesChannel" href="https://www.youtube.com/@AnythingGoesChannel" title="PJW" target="_blank" rel="noopener">modernity&nbsp; </a>- has a rich seam of contradiction, nonsense and hypocrisy to explore and analyse just about any time he lifts the lids on MSM drains and peers inside. Top polemic and sarcasm as usual, but an essential counterpoint to the really worrying gaslighting from the captured mainstream media. But who believes anything the "Mainstream Media" says now without verifying? The twitter audience is especially cynical, with traditional news media struggling to reach 20% credibility in recent polls. Now recall Mark Twain's observation that it is easy to fool someone, but much harder to convince them they have been fooled - which is vital for the enduring success of advertising, religious and political propaganda. The effort to try and protect what little credibility the MSM retains is becoming increasingly desperate to draw attention away from the simple fact that little or nothing is being done (beyond denial) to address the criticism of two tier policing that has been apparent since the <a data-mce-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Hamas-led_attack_on_Israel" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Hamas-led_attack_on_Israel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hamas kidnap and murder action in Israel on October 7th 2023, led to mass demonstrations under Palestinian flags of solidarity in </a>the UK. <iframe id="ercxsyhbqlzk2sl4i" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xXRuIUubxeQ" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXRuIUubxeQ" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xXRuIUubxeQ" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe>What is going on? The "far right" rioting in the UK this week seemed to have been a randomly organised puppet show, performed by some woefully untalented wannabe terrorists, which seems much like the amateurish Jan 6th Washington pantomime insurrection. What is going on?&nbsp; Behind all this, the traditional media simply cannot compete with Twitter's reach and immediacy, and is eager to try and bring Twitter down by any means - before their entire business models are cannibalised as all eyeballs steadily drift away to more engaging content.&nbsp;Elon Musk’s X has accused a group of major advertisers of antitrust violations in a new lawsuit claiming the group conspired to “boycott” advertising on the platform.The lawsuit claims an influential ad industry group organized “to collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising from Twitter” because the group was concerned that the platform had deviated from brand safety standards after Musk’s acquisition in late 2022.The group is the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, also known as GARM, a voluntary ad-industry initiative (boycott) run by the World Federation of Advertisers that aims to help brands avoid having their advertisements appear alongside illegal or harmful content.This style of politically motivated cancellation grew from the activism of 1970s animal rights movements, which moved on from physical intimidation and sabotage to <a data-mce-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights_movement" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights_movement" title="Animal rights movement">guerilla online activism.</a>&nbsp;The news media industry has become a propaganda battleground that is fighting for eyeballs to sell to advertisers at any cost; including objectivity and truth. Which has led to the creation of fact checking and verification services. The traditional news media has been complaining to politicians for a long time that they are in a fight to the death with Musk's Twitter and other services like Rumble that do not easily defer to political coercion.&nbsp; Security services and politicians are struggling to know where to pitch the location of their demands to censor the industry on the scale of "essential national security interests" to "nice to have" expedient restraint to avoiding embarrassing politicians, and keep those guilty of poor judgement, safe from the consequences of their action.&nbsp;No surprisingly, traditional media is happy to help "prosecutors" scare content creators and publishers with the prospect of a knock on the door at 3am, from the thought police.<h3>We'd be a lot more comfortable about this state of affairs if the government passing out the diktats had been demonstrably democratically elected - without having gamed a flawed system -with MPs that have "achieved" in the real world beyond the incestuous world of Westminster politics, and are continuously accountable to electors. We - the 80% silenced majority - are really uneasy that this absolutely fundamental oversight and revision of freedom has been rushed through by a novice administration with the support of just 20% of the electorate.</h3>

Paul Watson on gaslighting in Brum

<h2>Ballots not bricks?</h2>revised 06aug24 14:02&nbsp; Elon Musk's intervention - to ask awkward questions to support the case for balance and freedom of expression (the antithesis of two-tier policing) - has flushed out some Far Left "hate not hope"&nbsp; agitators who wanted to be seen grandstanding and criticizing Elon for daring to ask inconvenient questions on 2-tier policing. Keir and his acolytes are annoyed that they cannot reach through the screen and snatch his keyboard -&nbsp; and throw it away, in the way that Met Police chief Mark Rowley recently did with a Sky News reporter's microphone. <iframe id="saw16xeifilzjspln4" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cy-TdWhVDbM" class="w-full bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;" allowfullscreen="" data-url="https://youtu.be/cy-TdWhVDbM?si=hW38nzYWdLcGatui" data-corners="default" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cy-TdWhVDbM" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9;"></iframe>Not surprising if Rowley is stressed having to smile for the cameras when retired police officers are asking about the alleged "standing army" of 6000 riot police: ".... About this Elite Band of Brothers, this team of highly trained Public Order Officers.... No-one has heard of them. Where have they been training? Where do they come from? You haven't got them. It is BS. You will corral a few cops and draft them in. All cops are trained in Public Order. So this "Elite" bit frightens no-one. We have seen them cowering whilst furniture is thrown at them.&nbsp; The only "Elite" bit about them is their qualifications. They now have degrees. Years ago, they would have been ex- military police, marines, soldiers, air force police, shore-patrol sailors.... Not any more. We have qualified ballet dancers, grief counsellors, diversity officers, HR specialists and accountants. Pick a fight with someone who can fight. Today the police must be nice to everyone, even in a riot. So good luck. I realise you are probably a very nice chap yourself; but you are not dealing with nice chaps. And it is too late&nbsp;now ....... The truth is that the Public has the Police the politicians want, not the Police the Public wants. Get it.....?We are still in the grip of divide and dissipate. How about we all just focus the energy and appetite for revolution on the embarrassing illegitimacy Keir's 20% Tyranny government and the fantasy mandate from just 20% of the electorate? We must clamour for an electoral platform that will prevent this outrage to democracy from happening again and also provide the politically homeless and disenfranchised with evidence that they are being heard, and politicians are properly accountable....The riots using the murder of three children as the excuse to lob bricks at police has played straight into the arms of Sir Keir Stalin, who was positively bristling with pride when he recalled that in 2011 as Head of the Crown Prosecution Service, he invented a legal production line for seeing that demonstrators could be swept into jail without their feet touching the ground. And now we are told he is thinking of rewarding informers... bring on the Stasi. Social credits if you hand your neighbour in?&nbsp; There is a petition going around asking for the removal of Keir Starmer as Prime Minister, already some 70,000 signatures; although it's not going to happen ...&nbsp; but it is a more constructive way to let off steam than lobbing a brick. So we should focus all our energies on the process of lawfully removing this bogus government as rapidly as possible. And replace with a properly democratically elected government of proven achievers. Which is of course the WOTE way. <h3>There is even a handy piece of moral high ground we can stand on whilst doing this, where we can look down on Starmer's one-sided condemnation of the far-right thugs, and point out there has been far-left chicanery that has gamed the flawed electoral process by sleight of voting, that needs addressing. </h3>The idea that just 20% of the electorate is responsible for putting Labour in power is unsustainable in the event of a challenge to his legitimacy and claim to have a mandate based on a landslide win.So we, the disenfranchised and abused electorate need to pause and work out what to do next. Who is offering a credible alternative to Labour's far-left political thuggery - that can accommodate a wide enough range of political realities that amount to the sort of "preconfigured and prestressed coalition" that the Conservative party successfully managed to provide until recently, with its traditional "broad church" for the liberal conservative outlook that has represented the so-called silent majority of Britain for the last 50 years or more..? Parties that are narrowly focused by ideology, religion or ethnicity are not able to provide long term solutions to a heterogeneous society trying to cope with the evolving realities of the 21st century.Dissenters must leverage our politicians' fear of fairer and more accountable election formats that provide representation for those who have been ignored for years. Ballots not bricks is the answer for those who have been misled by politicians who have failed to control the mass immigration that has fundamentally changed communities and our way of life without ever asking the permission of the electorate.We would obviously say that the ideas on this website are the basis of moving forward by respecting the will of the electorate.&nbsp; All of it, and more often than once every five years. We would also suggest that any politician that rejects the idea of fair elections that enable the electorate to hold their MPs to account on a daily basis, is an extreme left-wing fascist.<h3>Sir Keir Starmer &amp; Co can stop this unrest right now - accept you won a majority by gaming a seriously dysfunctional system that has been getting increasingly embarrassing and difficult to excuse since the Brexit Referendum - which was won with a simple majority of the votes cast. Rather different to a fantasy mandate based on 20% of the electorate or 35% of votes cast.&nbsp;</h3>It was not ideal that the entire electorate was not involved - and absolutely not the result expected by the "Elites", but the closest thing to genuine democracy seen in Europe for a long time. So Keir, put your hands up and admit there is a huge democratic deficit to address, and work to create a better system that can motivate and engage the entire electorate... and not simply take the mick...&nbsp;<figure id="figure-51ychy6dbhlzjuwk3n"><img id="51ychy6dbhlzjuwk3n" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/6UUCJRGq4d1q849JbRKqvg1ORYLPgnoAKuZzfyRqIJ7lvb3Cn79r7E5F61yPHxGK.jpg" alt="us national holiday pennants" title="us national holiday pennants" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 75% 0%;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="75%" data-positiony="0%" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/6UUCJRGq4d1q849JbRKqvg1ORYLPgnoAKuZzfyRqIJ7lvb3Cn79r7E5F61yPHxGK.jpg" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: 75% 0%;"></figure>https://wote.uk/blog/ballots-not-bricks

WOTE.uk

Blog: the Revolution starts here...

What does labour want to do?

The root of the rot?

doing the left and right thing with a third tier

nothing to see here...

Paul Watson on gaslighting in Brum

ballots not bricks